fredag 20. juni 2014

The Australian Aboriginal Dreamtime.

The question arises: what is the Australian Aboriginal Dreamtime? The answer to this is obtained via a brief, though circuitous route.

If we, in a strictly non-gender sense, divide human capacity for perceiving reality into masculine and feminine faculties, we very soon learn that ‘the real world’ is not as easily grasped as vi might have hoped – reality is multi-dimensional. Indeed, the masculine, external, strictly material perception proves to be of relatively minor importance. No, this is not to say that one can walk through walls and closed doors without acquiring a bloodied and probably broken nose.

One simple tool that will help us in our quest is to give each of our two faculties a symbol: 1 (one) for the masculine external and 0 (zero) for the feminine internal. And let us also assert here that all men and all women have both masculine and feminine (1 and 0) perception capacity.

What we know of the relatively minor masculine is that it’s a chatterbox and a bossy boots. Form the moment we wake up till the time we go to sleep, this egotistical little dictator, made grossly insecure by the physical world’s constant threats to our safety, is continuously shouting in our heads: ‘mind this’, ‘be careful of that’, ‘get real’, ‘pay attention’. On the other hand, the feminine has long since given up trying to compete with the idiot it has to work with: after all, within the confines of its job description, One is doing as it should. A way in which we might grasp the relativity of these two is to say that where One is a bush telegraph, Zero is a cell phone with internet capacity. For myself, I would say that Zero gives me, and anyone else for that matter, direct access to the humungous main-frame computer at the centre of the universe – God. And by ‘the centre of the universe’ I mean the centre of myself – or yourself.

Ancient civilizations everywhere were clearly concerned with the balancing of these two forces. It is a) clear that they succeeded and b) obvious that this did not result in lives spent in navel-gazing. Our world is strewn with clear and unambiguous evidence that Megalithic Man was a scientific genius.

But it is in the nature of One to abhor compromise; it demands the right to dominate, that is, it thinks SNAGs are wimps. Its most recent and successful rebellion and rise to power was consolidated in the hands of Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and his horde of Cartesian Philosophers. If, they said, you don’t touch, taste, smell, hear or see it, then it just isn’t there. Later, they came up with the idea of lobotomizing those hapless heretics for whom ‘it’ would not go away. Cartesian insanity reached its peak when shock troops were sent to countries like Australia to root out the heresy by exterminating the people who clung to it. Yes, at its base, colonialism was an offshoot of One’s rise to power, a phenomenon seeded at det dawn of the Piscean Age.

In the West, these same heretics came to be known to us as Hermeticists, Cabbalists and Alchemists. The transmutation of lead into gold became a metaphor for balancing the hemispheres of the mind. The alchemist was his own laboratory and he, himself, was the experiment. His Eastern counterparts left us with the concept of balancing the Yin and the Yang. And they all went to their graves telling us that we should make the inner as the outer and the below like unto the above. Today’s materialistic and mechanistic world, the fragmentation of religion and subsequent fragmentation of values, the fragmentation of knowledge and, ultimately, the fragmentation of the individual can all be seen as springing from the Cartesian consolidation of One’s rise to power.

It's flower, of course, is the bucket of bolts we call a computer. And with this monstrosity, the Cartesians have philosophically shot themselves in the foot, for its basis is the binary system – an integration and utilisation of ones and zeros; it would seem that the below is like unto the above after all.

Yes, dear reader, the Australian Aboriginal Dreamtime is an alchemical, heretic, Jungian type of psychological process by which balancing the one and the zero gives us a total grasp of reality. And furthermore, the Dreaming is not yesterday, today or tomorrow – it is timeless; it si now and it is forever. Through it, all mind and soul is connected; it is one.

So, dear brother and sister, remember to keep the faith and keep on dreaming.

tirsdag 17. juni 2014

The Great Robbery

Written by Charles Eisenstein, 2005


The Great Robbery

The sullen, resentful, rebellious teenager is a figure so universal in our culture as to have become a cliché. Whether it takes the form of a brooding, barely-controlled rage, or explodes outward as violence, or turns inward as depression, anger is a near-universal characteristic of modern youth. What we hesitate to acknowledge, though, is that this anger is well-founded. It is not some passing immaturity. Young people are angry about something, something real, and if we pay that anger heed, and trace it to its source, we will find there a clue to what has gone wrong with our world. Better yet, we will also discover a path toward the world’s healing.

On one level, the anger of youth stems from that cardinal characteristic of adolescence, idealism. Idealism is the belief that a more beautiful world is possible, and not only possible, but attainable. It is the conviction that we need not settle for the lesser world in which we find ourselves.

Allied to idealism is its interior reflection: a sense of our own individual magnificence. This is the feeling, “I am in this world to do amazing things.” It is the knowledge that we are divine beings here for a divine purpose—nothing less than to participate in the creating of that more beautiful world of our idealistic intuitions.

When these beliefs are denied or betrayed, outrage is the inevitable result. Essentially, we are told No! A more beautiful world is not possible. Things are just as they should be. It is foolish to dream of more. This is the way it is done. This is the way of the world. Get used to it. That’s what my fourth-grade math teacher told me when I complained of boredom doing pages of long division, “You’re going to be bored a lot in life, so you’d better get used to it.” From this perspective, schooling that is a dull routine, beholden to petty authority, motivated by trivial external rewards, defined by fixed schedules, and filled with meaningless assignments is actually good—salutary practice for the “real world".

The teenager’s rage builds up over years. The fourth grader, gazing out the window, looking at the clock, waiting for that half-hour of freedom at recess, sneaking some social time into the margins of the schoolday. The 12-year-old, looking out on a vast world into which he is never allowed unsupervised or unscheduled, too busy to play. The high school student, scrambling under the pressure to excel, disciplining herself to stick with the grind. The first-grader, sulking on the “time-out bench", humiliated but still defiant. Children made to feel ashamed of themselves by parents, principles, churches and teachers. Made to shrink into something less. Made to shy away from the wide wide world. Be small. Be practical. Lower your expectations.

Yet after 15 or so years of spirit-breaking, something in the teenager still resists. Unable to articulate what is wrong, the teenager rebels in whatever way he can. Anticipating this, the spirit-wrecking Machine turns this rebellion toward its own purposes. Set off a smoke bomb in the bathroom, get caught, and learn the lesson, “You can change nothing. Resistance is futile.” Or the rebellion is diverted toward harmless avenues of expression that pose no threat to the system—listening to loud music, using profane language, getting tattoos and piercings.

The anger of the teenager is the indignation of the dispossessed. The Great Robbery is first and foremost the pillage of their childhood. Childhood is supposed to be a realm of exploration in which we discover our passions, our selves, our life purpose. What we get instead is enslavement to schedules and obligations. Childhood is supposed to be a time of play. And what is play? Play is something far different from what we, in a degenerate age, call fun—the consumption of entertainment. Play is supposed to be nothing less than practice in creating the world. Its highest expression is “deep play", the kind which unfolds over days and weeks. In deep play, children create entire worlds of the imagination, in which toys are but props. In so doing, they prepare themselves for an adulthood empowered in the divine function of world-creation.

One way we rob children of play is by taking away the time and space for creating worlds of the imagination, and filling their lives instead with preprogrammed activities, prefabricated worlds through which they proceed as instructed, step by step. Video games are a prime example. Here, a world is already created by software programmers. The children merely walk through it. The same goes for television—no imagination is necessary on the child’s part, because it has already been done in the TV studio. The same as well for organized, supervised sports. This kind of childhood is preparation for a very different adulthood than that of the empowered world-creator. It is an adulthood bound to live a preprogrammed life, a life handed one, a life not one’s own. This is how we are robbed of our potential for magnificence.

An equally grave loss is the loss of our passion and purpose. Bereft of the chance to explore our inner world, we grow up not truly knowing what we love or what we want to make of our lives. In the absence of a passion, we easily accept the range of available substitutes. I might as well be an engineer. Maybe I’ll major in finance. That might be okay. I’ll get a good job at least. Ask someone thus dispossessed what they really love, what makes their heart sing, and they won’t even know.

If you accept that the purpose of life is indeed merely to get by, to survive, to get a secure job with benefits, get married, have kids, retire securely, grow old and die, then perhaps this result isn’t so tragic. But if the adolescent intuition is true, that we are indeed here on earth for a magnificent purpose, then the cutoff from our passion is a terrible crime. Before you read any further, decide which alternative you believe. What does your heart tell you?

I think the spirit of youth never actually dies, but lies dormant in even the most hardened, controlled, uptight adult. That spirit will never be satisfied with a life handed on down by the impersonal forces the drive our society. Its dissatisfaction manifests as an omnipresent discontent, a feeling of emptiness that the rewards of doing-as-you-are-told—status, material possessions, etc.—can never fill.

If you are in the place of disconnection from your true self, true passion, true reason for being on this earth, don’t despair. Well, actually, do despair. Despair, or more precisely depression, is often the first step toward discovering true life. In order to discover the right life, it is first necessary to withdraw from the wrong life. This necessity drives many of the supposed character flaws common to teenagers. Laziness, procrastination, apathy are all different permutations of the urge to withdraw. They are a covert way of saying NO! when more overt rebellion is impossible, or demands too great a leap of courage. In the American South the slaves, unable to rebel outright, instead pretended to be lazy and stupid, in many cases coming to believe in their own pretense. Teenagers often do the same thing. Stupidity is a kind of protection. But—and I don’t care who you are—you are not stupid. Never believe that.

Oftentimes, laziness and apathy are insufficient to withstand the pressure to perform. Applying willpower and self-discipline, threatening ourselves with the inner voice of shame and guilt, enticing ourselves with external rewards like grades, status, and approval, we overcome the urge to blow it all off. We think of ways to make ourselves live the lives expected of us. In this case the rebellion of the soul manifests even more deeply, for example as clinical depression, anxiety disorder, disease, or suicide.

The defining feature of depression is a kind of paralysis, which is precisely the withdrawal from the wrong life I have been talking about. It could be the wrong job, wrong relationship, or something else, but essentially it represents the soul’s rebellion against circumstances that the conscious mind believes cannot be changed. “No!” says the soul. “I’d rather not get out of bed!” Psychiatric medications can quiet this voice for a while, but even if successful they only end up transforming it into another form of refusal.

That deepest, truest part of ourselves, that I refer to as the soul, or the spirit of youth, will always think of a way to eventually bring us into the space of emptiness that is necessary for the discovery of our true self and life purpose. Disease is one avenue. Cancer in particular represents the somatization of a kind of self-betrayal, in which cells forget their proper function and usurp the body’s resources for their own unlimited growth. Psychologically, the counterpart of these renegade cells is the security-obsessed ego, consuming all our gifts for the dead-end goals of security in all its guises: wealth, status, power, and so on. And if death is the result, so be it. Better to die than to live the wrong life. So goes the logic of the soul.

This is also the logic that propels the tremendous rise in the youth suicide rate. When every other avenue of refusal has been cut off, the teenager is trapped. Self-destruction is seen as the only option. The escalating regime of control imposed by parents and schools, with the aid of surveillance technology, psychological manipulation, and psychiatric drugs, makes suicide all the more likely. And the antidote is to empower young people—and the spirit of youth in all of us—to discover another way out. To say, “Life is just fine, it is you who has the problem” is incredibly disempowering. But that is the implicit message in the regime of medication and control.

Here is the right message—and it applies equally to the suicidal teenager as well as to the commonly resentful. The message is that what you have always secretly suspected is true. The world is not supposed to be like this. Your intuitions of something more beautiful are valid. You are meant for an amazing, divine purpose. You are brilliant, possessed of unique gifts just waiting to be discovered. And—very important—anyone who tells you otherwise is lying. Worse than lying, they are stealing from you. Much has been stolen already, but there is one thing no one can ever steal (though you might put it aside, temporarily) and that is your soul knowledge of the message I have just related. What’s more, it is possible to recover all that has been lost. It might take time, but no one is a helpless victim. All we need is to reconnect with the power we already have. It is the power, first and foremost, to say no. You have been exercising that power all along, in fact, but when you begin to see the source of the betrayal, when you begin to see through the lies that construct the lesser life and lesser world that most of us have grudgingly accepted, then that power is multiplied a thousandfold. You have the power to withdraw, not through the unconscious mechanisms of laziness, depression or suicide, but consciously, mindfully. And then, in the empty space that you create for yourself, begin to play. Begin to do what you enjoy, without having to justify it to anyone. From this starting point you will discover meaning, passion, and life, and you will become indominable.

torsdag 12. juni 2014


Jeg innser selvfølgelig at i dagens akutte situasjon med KS, new public management og internasjonale prøver hengende truende over hodene på oss, så er det mest akutt akkurat nå å få stagget dette. Og i så henseende er engasjementet mange lærere i dag utviser GLIMRENDE og veldig viktig! Men jeg tror bestemt at skal vi virkelig få til noen varig endring, ikke bare være i stadig maktkamp med KS og andre styringsgale idioter i årevis fremover, så er det svært viktig at vi forstår hvorfor og hvordan problemene har oppstått i utgangspunktet.

Først i dag begynner flere å innse at skolen har blitt en kunnskapsfabrikk. Mange synes å oppfatte at denne situasjonen er noe som nærmest har skjedd over natta. Denne oppfatningen tror jeg det er veldig viktig å korrigere. 

Slik jeg klart forstår det; uniformering av lærere er «bare» siste skudd på treet i en lang fabrikk historie. Innføringen av new public management er det tiltaket som ble innført nå sist, og med det ble støtet satt inn på lærerne og dette oppleves som personlig og derfor langt mer dramatisk enn når tiltak tidligere har blitt satt inn på formelle lærerplaner eller skolens struktur. Men i prinsippet henger alt i hop – varen (kunnskap), klienten (eleven) og arbeideren (læreren) er alt sammen deler av et hele – og i en skikkelig effektiv fabrikk må alt sammen reguleres og kontrolleres. Og med new public management og KS kom altså turen, for alvor, til lærerne.

Man kan selvfølgelig få skremmende bilder i hodet om en villet, ond makt som ønsker å omvende oss alle til roboter, men jeg tror det er korrekt å forstå det dithen at utviklingen er et resultat av tenkningen skolen selv har dyrket, og fostret frem.

Hvordan kan det ha seg at mange i dag kan hevde at skolen vår har blitt en kunnskapsfabrikk? Først er det altså viktig å forstå at dette nettopp ikke er noe som har skjedd over natta. Det primære problemet med disse «over natta forklaringene», er at de forutsetter at folk flest er ekstremt lette å styre/manipulere – UTEN å problematisere hvordan voksne folk har blitt så lettlurte! Er folk flest egentlig dumme og lette å manipulere? Er det slik vi blir født?

Jeg tror ikke det! Og her kommer det historiske aspektet inn som nettopp har med skolen å gjøre. Vi havner i nyliberalistiske, new public management, byråkratiske tilstander fordi skolen og dens forståelse av hva kunnskap og læring er, i generasjoner, ikke har rustet oss til å utøve motstand. Skolen er med andre ord fundamental og svært viktig.

Kort sagt; Utdanning er, også historisk sett, i all hovedsak opptatt av etablert kunnskap. Man begynner fakta formidlingen allerede første skoledag (sammen med en intens øvelse i stillesitting disiplin). På ungdomsskolen begynner man så smått med argumentasjon (for og imot) og dette fortsetter til elevene enten slutter på skolen eller begynner på høyere studier. På høyere studier fullbyrdes argumentasjonsteknikken – kalt den hypotetiske metode. Dvs. evne til å samle inn all tilgjengelig data for så å drøfte basert på logisk tenkning. Sagt på en annen måte: Utdanningen har, siden opplysningstiden, hatt som hovedmål å forme menneskene til å passe inn i et såkalt sekulært samfunn. Det betyr et samfunn basert på logisk/rasjonell, og jeg liker å føye til rigid, tanke. Det høres tilforlatelig ut når det står i skolens mønsterplan at barn og unge skal oppdras til å bli samfunnsgagnlige individer, men altså…  

Den logisk-rasjonelle tenkningen vi alle har blitt drillet i på skolen, fra vi er små barn, har nå forplantet seg til vår offentlige forvaltning. De rigide systemene blir stadig mer rigide og byråkratiske. Vi har sågar kommet dithen at politikken ikke tilbyr oss noe alternativ; Når folk skal si hva de synes er galt med Norge, så hører man ofte; "For mye byråkrati". Og litt håpløst kan man si at det har blitt når ingen politiske partier har det i seg å stagge byråkratiet – det som mange oppfatter som vårt største problem. Mange stemmer Høyre og Fr.p. for da lager i alle fall ikke staten alt dette byråkratiet. Det de åpenbart ikke evner å tenke over er at innføringen av New Public management, hvilket jo er en bedriftsøkonomisk modell og særlig støttet av nettopp høyresiden, så består jo den av lite annet enn et skjemavelde...

Således kan vi si at vi blir utsatt for rigid-logisk tenkning hvor vi enn snur oss og man kan dermed begynne å se at sekulære og såkalt materialistiske tenkningen har blitt internalisert i våre sinn. Det har blitt vår mentalitet. Vårt samfunn har blitt sekulært – det har blitt konformt. Mye tyder på at vi ikke lenger bare anser ting som varer, men at vi nå kollektivt er i ferd med å begynne å oppfatte også kunnskap og mennesker som varer. Og hvordan vi oppfatter ting, har selvfølgelig alt å gjøre med hvordan vi tenker.

Det er i denne sammenheng vi kollektivt står maktesløse overfor byråkrati. Det er i denne sammenheng man må forstå hvordan vi overhodet har kommet dithen at mange (flertallet) i dag synes det er helt naturlig å behandle mennesker og kunnskap som varer og maskiner som kan puttes i (diagnose-) båser.

Jeg tror med andre ord det er på høy tid at vi begynner å forstå at problemene med byråkrati, både her og der, oppstår nettopp på grunn av den tenkningen og de problemløsningsstrategiene skolen lenge har lært oss. Jeg innser selvfølgelig – og jeg gjentar – at i dagens akutte situasjon med KS, new public management og internasjonale prøver hengende truende over hodene på oss, så er det mest akutt akkurat nå å få stagget dette. Og i så henseende er lærernes engasjement i dag GLIMRENDE og veldig viktig! Men jeg tror altså at skal vi virkelig få til noen varig endring, ikke bare være i stadig maktkamp med KS og andre styringsgale idioter i årevis fremover, en kamp vi etter alle solemerker er dømt til å tape hvis ingen fundamental endring skjer, så må vi forstå kjernen i problemene, forstå hvorfor de har oppstått. Vi må forstå hvor utrolig viktig skolen er, og ikke bøye av en tomme når det gjelder å vektlegge at læring MÅ være en individuell prosess der barn og unge skal få veiledning og oppmuntring til å søke kunnskap, til å undre seg, til å glede seg over hvor morsomt det faktisk er å lære nye ting! Skolen har aldri vært slik for de fleste av oss, bare for kanskje 10 prosent som er særlig gode på den logisk/rasjonelle tenkningen som passer så godt for å komme i posisjon for å øve innflytelse for videre utvikling i vårt sekulære, kapitalistiske, og stadig mer målstyrte byråkrati-samfunn. Men selv om skolen stort sett har vært en dørgende kjedelig og fordummende anstalt for de fleste av oss, behøver ikke det bety at den fortsatt må være slik. Det går an å tenke helt nytt omkring det vi forstår med skole, kunnskap, læring, og aldri har det vært viktigere enn det er i dag!

To videoer av Ken Robinson om skole:

Mange tenkere om skolesystemet: (tekst)

Sitat fra boken; “The ignorant Schoolmaster. Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation” Av Jacques Ranciere

To små videoer av Noam Chomskey om skole;